Whether being a Kleros juror makes money depends on what you expect from it. If you want stable passive income, it will probably disappoint you. If you hold PNK, can judge case facts, and are willing to accept the risk of losing staked tokens directly when your vote fails, it can be a positive-expectation but highly volatile way to participate. Staking itself does not generate yield. Only when you are selected and vote with the majority can you receive a share of arbitration fees and slashed tokens.

A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!!
How much do you actually need to stake
There is no fixed entry fee to become a juror. You need to hold PNK tokens and stake them in the subcourt you choose. Each subcourt has its own minimum stake. This parameter is set by governance and can vary greatly between courts.
Your stake determines the probability of being drawn to hear a case. The more you stake, the higher your chance of being selected. This means you cannot really start testing the waters with very little capital. If your stake is too low, you may not be selected for a long time, and participation becomes pure waiting. Research data shows that at a certain point, PNK staked in Kleros contracts accounted for about 17% of total supply, and only some active jurors had actually been selected. Your staked PNK does not earn anything while it is not selected.
What happens after you are selected
Once you are selected to hear a case, part of your staked PNK will be locked. The locked amount is related to how many times you are selected. The formula is roughly D = α × minStake × number of times selected.
Then you need to review evidence and vote within the required time. The key mechanism here is that your profit and loss both depend on whether your vote is coherent with the final majority result. If you vote in the same direction as the final majority, you get back your locked PNK and receive a share of the arbitration fees paid in ETH by the disputing parties, as well as PNK slashed from jurors whose votes were incoherent. If you vote differently from the final majority, the locked portion of your PNK will be slashed and distributed to coherent jurors.
In plain terms: you bet on the majority side, and if you lose, you lose the amount you put up.
The real scale of slashing risk
Slashing is not just losing a little. It is a direct loss of your locked PNK. How much you lose depends on how many times you were selected, what the minimum stake is, and how the α parameter is set. If you are selected multiple times in one case, because Kleros allows the same juror to be drawn multiple times to increase voting weight, the locked amount stacks accordingly, and the slashing risk is also amplified.
What deserves even more attention is the chain effect caused by the appeal mechanism. Kleros appeals significantly increase the number of jurors and arbitration fees. The number of jurors in appeal rounds grows exponentially, with each round being twice the previous round plus one. If you vote in the first instance but the case is appealed, your vote may be overturned by later rounds. The appeal mechanism was designed to prevent bribery attacks, but it also means your coherence judgment must survive more rounds of testing.
Some actual participants have expressed dissatisfaction on the Kleros forum. As a challenger, the returns were far higher than as a juror. After considering gas costs, staking in the PoH court was simply not worth it, and they planned to unstake. This reflects a reality: a juror's income ceiling is limited by the share of arbitration fees, while gas costs and opportunity costs are real expenses.
What makes it not worth doing
The professional threshold of cases. Kleros jurors are randomly selected and are not required to have expertise in the field involved in the case. Critics point out that jurors may not understand the parties' expectations or the law that should apply, especially in complex cases. If you are selected to hear a case in a field you do not understand at all, such as a complex DeFi protocol dispute, your chance of voting coherently decreases.
The inherent tension between economic incentives and fairness. Juror voting behavior is driven by economic incentives, which raises questions about procedural fairness. Academic analysis notes that jurors have a direct economic interest in the dispute outcome. Their profit or loss depends on whether the side they vote for wins. This conflicts with the traditional arbitration requirement that arbitrators remain neutral. You are essentially using your own judgment to bet on an outcome, and that outcome determines whether you profit.
The frequency of being selected is uncontrollable. You cannot choose when to participate. After staking, you may be selected repeatedly, or you may not be selected for a long time. If your purpose is to earn some pocket money, this randomness makes income extremely unstable.
Checklist before participating
If you are still hesitating, ask yourself these questions in order:
Do you hold PNK? If not, you need to acquire PNK first. Staking itself does not generate yield, and PNK price volatility is additional risk exposure for you.
Can you afford to have your staked PNK slashed? Slashing for incoherent voting is immediate and cannot be appealed. If you cannot accept this loss, do not stake.
Do you have time to review evidence? Jurors need to complete review and voting after the evidence submission period ends and before voting closes. The consequences of missing the voting window depend on the specific rules, but your staked PNK may already be locked.
Do you treat it as an income source or a way to participate? If your goal is to use idle PNK for a little extra income, and you can accept that most of the time you will not be selected and that you may lose money after being selected, then it can be an option. If you need stable cash flow, being a Kleros juror is not the right tool.

A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!!
References
- Kleros Yellow Paper (Chinese), no update date indicated; checked on 2026-10-16.
- Webthesis: Kleros Protocol Analysis, no update date indicated; checked on 2026-10-16.
- Kleros White Paper, no update date indicated; checked on 2026-10-16.
- Kleros One-Pager, no update date indicated; checked on 2026-10-16.
- Kleros: Mente vs Coop Kleros Case Evidence, published or updated on 2020-03-26; checked on 2026-10-16.
- Kleros Forum: disputer.eth Reply Activity, no update date indicated; checked on 2026-10-16.
- Ohio State University Moritz College of Law: Decentralized Justice and Blockchain Arbitration, a Socio-Legal Case Study of Kleros, no update date indicated; checked on 2026-10-16.
- Pravni Zapisi: Decentralized Justice: How Kleros Empowers Jurors in Online Dispute Resolution, published or updated in 2025-07; checked on 2026-10-16.


