China's 8 Departments 2026 New Rules: What RWA Tokenization Being Named Means
At the beginning of this year, the crypto space was suddenly flooded with news—eight government departments jointly issued a document officially bringing RWA tokenization under regulatory oversight.
Many people in China initially reacted with anxiety: What about the crypto I hold? Can I still trade? Actually, there's no need to panic. This policy isn't targeting retail investors, but it will indeed change how you access crypto information domestically.
This article breaks it down in plain English: what the new regulations actually say, what it means that RWA tokenization has been singled out, and what you should watch out for.
A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!！
What Exactly Do the New Eight-Department Regulations Say?
Before diving into the background, let's clarify—which eight departments issued this document?
On February 6, 2026, the People's Bank of China, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the National Financial Regulatory Administration, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange jointly issued the "Notice on Further Preventing and Addressing Risks Related to Virtual Currencies" (Yinfa [2026] No. 42), referred to as "Document No. 42" or the "new regulations," which were printed and distributed with the approval of the State Council.
This new regulation has two major changes.
First: It officially defines RWA tokenization for the first time. The official definition is: activities that use encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to convert asset ownership, usufruct, etc., into tokens or other rights and debt certificates with token characteristics, and conduct issuance and trading.
In simple terms: the entire process of turning real-world assets (like buildings, debt, stocks) into digital tokens using blockchain technology now has an official definition.
Second: It establishes the regulatory principle of "strictly prohibited domestically, strictly regulated overseas." It explicitly prohibits conducting RWA tokenization activities within China, as well as providing related intermediary and information technology services.
At the same time, the China Securities Regulatory Commission also issued the "Regulatory Guidelines for Overseas Issuance of Asset-Backed Securities Tokens Based on Domestic Assets" (2026 Announcement No. 1), strictly supervising RWA tokenization businesses conducted overseas based on the ownership or usufruct of domestic assets, in accordance with laws and regulations, similar to asset securitization.
Domestic regulations are also very specific. The notice requires that the registered names and business scopes of enterprises and individual businesses must not contain terms like "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real world asset tokenization," or "RWA."
So, the new regulations are not targeting ordinary investors—they target those who publicly issue and promote these products within China.
From "One-Size-Fits-All" to "Differentiated Regulation"
The most interesting change in these new regulations is the upgrade in regulatory thinking.
The 2021 "Notice 924" took a blanket ban approach to all crypto-related activities. However, Document No. 42 of 2026 formally abolishes this old rule, distinguishes RWA tokenization from general virtual currencies for the first time, and establishes the core principle of "differentiated regulation, combining (dredging/guiding) and blocking."
In essence, the regulators' message is clear: Speculation in virtual currencies not backed by real assets will continue to be strictly prohibited; but RWA tokenization supported by the real economy can proceed under qualified conditions.
Domestically, RWA tokenization activities are generally prohibited, but an exception is reserved—"related business activities conducted relying on specific financial infrastructure with the approval of competent business authorities according to laws and regulations" can proceed legally, leaving a policy window for future pilot innovations.
Overseas, domestic entities conducting RWA tokenization business abroad will be strictly regulated under the principle of "same business, same risk, same rules," with implementation through a filing system and a negative list.
Another important signal: RWA tokenization is defined as a new type of securities activity within the compliance framework, and cross-border RWA tokenization is considered cross-border securities activity. This means compliant securities intermediaries holding dual licenses in Mainland China and Hong Kong will have a first-mover advantage in this new track.
In a nutshell: The new regulations firmly prohibit "fake RWA, real speculation," but are gradually building an institutional framework for compliant innovation supported by the real economy. From "one-size-fits-all" to "differentiated regulation," the regulatory toolkit is becoming more refined.
Why Did the New Regulations Single Out RWA Tokenization?
This brings us back to a practical issue: RWA was indeed very hot in 2025, but where did the problems lie?
In recent years, speculative炒作 (hype) under the guise of RWA tokenization has occurred frequently. Some criminals, pretending to engage in "financial innovation," are actually involved in illegal fundraising, pyramid schemes, fraud, money laundering, and other illegal financial activities.
For example: You see someone online recruiting people into a group, claiming a certain "RWA project" can tokenize the property rights of an office building, and investing a few tens of thousands allows you to be a landlord collecting rent. The promotional materials sound plausible, but there may be no real assets behind it, or the assets aren't worth that much. Once you invest your money, the project team runs away, and you don't even know who to sue.
Industry experts clearly point out: Many investments claiming to be "RWA" domestically are essentially illegal asset securitization or even fraudulent activities. The core purpose of the new regulations is to eliminate the possibility of illegal fundraising by exploiting regulatory loopholes.
Do the New Regulations Directly Affect Ordinary People in China?
After discussing the policy background, let's get to the question everyone cares about most: How does this policy relate to you?
First, the new regulations do not affect your personal holding or trading of cryptocurrencies. The policy targets entities that issue, sell, promote, or organize related activities domestically—the "project parties" who recruit people and hold meetings—not retail investors. If you only operate on compliant platforms yourself, it has no direct bearing on you.
Second, domestically, it's advisable to steer clear of projects recruiting people under the banner of RWA. After the implementation of the new regulations, overseas entities and individuals are prohibited from illegally providing RWA tokenization-related services to domestic entities in any form.
What does this mean? Any activity you encounter domestically that calls itself an "RWA project," recruiting people via WeChat groups to sell tokens, is illegal and carries extremely high risk.
Third, legitimate platforms are unaffected. It's recommended to continue trading on top-tier exchanges that have obtained overseas compliance licenses.
Three Suggestions for Ordinary Investors
Suggestion 1: Stay away from any project recruiting people domestically under the name of "RWA" or "tokenization." Legitimate RWA projects only operate on platforms holding compliance licenses and do not engage in ground promotion or WeChat group recruitment in China. If you encounter such promotions, simply ignore them.
Suggestion 2: Use top-tier compliant exchanges. For example, OKX and Binance, which have compliance licenses overseas, offer an unaffected trading experience. It's recommended you trade on these platforms and avoid participating in dubious "tokenization" projects through informal channels.
Suggestion 3: Focus on Hong Kong as a compliance window. The new regulations do not completely close the door on RWA channels but leave a "narrow gate" for compliant cross-border financing. Hong Kong is actively promoting digital asset development, and securities intermediaries licensed in both Mainland China and Hong Kong are expected to gain a first-mover advantage in the RWA tokenization track. If you want to participate in RWA investments legitimately in the future, Hong Kong is a compliance window worth watching, but at this stage, it remains an institutional-level business, and individual investors should not blindly enter.
Reference steps:
- If you see someone promoting "RWA tokenized wealth management" or "guaranteed profit" projects in WeChat or QQ groups, it's advisable to report them directly
- Continue your daily trading on compliant platforms like OKX and Binance, maintaining your existing habits
- Monitor RWA-related developments from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission and the Mainland China Securities Regulatory Commission; the compliance path is gradually becoming clearer
If you're looking for a legitimate, compliant platform to hold assets, I've been using OKX and Binance. Both have global compliance layouts, stable trading experiences, and new user registration can even enjoy some fee discounts:
A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!！
The world's largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume,leading in security and liquidity.
New user benefit: Enjoy 20% off trading fees upon registration!
Investment carries risks, and the policy environment for cryptocurrencies is constantly changing. But one principle remains unchanged: stay away from those "RWA projects" engaging in pyramid scheme-style promotion and false advertising domestically, and choose compliant platforms for trading—that's more important than anything else.
FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who exactly are these new regulations from the eight departments targeting?
They primarily target institutions and individuals conducting virtual currency and RWA tokenization issuance, promotion, intermediary, and information technology services domestically, not ordinary investors. Retail investors buying, selling, and holding on compliant platforms are not directly affected.
2. Can I still buy Bitcoin and Ethereum in China after the new regulations?
Yes. Personal holding and trading activities on legitimate platforms domestically are not within the scope of the policy prohibition. However, be aware that domestic platform policies may adjust at any time, so it's advisable to diversify risk.
3. What is the principle of "strictly prohibited domestically, strictly regulated overseas"?
Strictly prohibited domestically: Activities such as RWA tokenization issuance, trading, and intermediary services are not allowed within China. Strictly regulated overseas: Domestic entities issuing RWA tokens involving domestic assets overseas must undergo strict approval or filing with departments like the NDRC and CSRC and cannot evade regulation.
4. What impact do the new regulations have on Hong Kong?
Hong Kong is seen as a "pilot window" for the compliant overseas issuance of Mainland assets. Mainland regulators have clarified that, upon approval, RWA-related businesses can be conducted relying on specific financial infrastructure. As an international financial center, Hong Kong is expected to become the preferred location for compliant RWA issuance.
5. What should ordinary investors do?
First, stay away from any project recruiting people domestically under the name of "RWA" or "tokenization." Second, choose overseas compliant platforms for trading, such as OKX and Binance. Third, monitor Hong Kong's digital asset regulatory developments, as it serves as a window for observing compliant domestic overseas issuance.
