What Are Token Incentives in DePIN Projects? Real Demand or Mining and Dumping?
The key to whether DePIN token incentives can generate real demand lies in one question: does network revenue come from external paying customers, or mainly from token minting and internal recycling? If most income comes from new investors buying the token, it is essentially a mine-and-dump scheme. If revenue comes from real money paid by enterprises for data, computing power or connectivity services, the project has taken the first step toward sustainability.
A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!！
Step 1: Understand the basic logic of DePIN token incentives – "chicken or egg"
DePIN projects use token rewards to attract ordinary people to contribute hardware resources (bandwidth, computing power, storage, map data, etc.). This is "supply-side incentive." The goal is to rapidly bootstrap a decentralized network – starting from scratch to compete with traditional giants would be almost hopeless otherwise.
The problem: if no real customers pay for these services after the network is built, the token rewards are essentially just "the project team printing money and handing it out to users," no different from a mine-and-dump model.
Criterion: Is revenue coming from external sources (enterprise customer payments) or from internal sources (new investors buying tokens / token minting)? The former signals real demand, the latter a zero-sum game.
Step 2: Look at two key indicators – distinguishing "real demand" from "mining and dumping"
Indicator 1: Revenue source structure
Verification is simple – look for these in the project's public data:
Signals of real demand: Named enterprise customers or partners exist, with repeated procurement, not just one-off pilots.
Signals of "mining and dumping": Most discussions revolve around "how to get more tokens" or "how to increase yield," with almost no mention of "who is buying the service."
Take Grass as an example: it sells web-scraped data to AI labs, has clear enterprise clients (such as Laion, Ontocord), and the founder has publicly stated the project is profitable. This is a verifiable signal of external revenue.
Indicator 2: Token value capture mechanism
Does the project return external revenue to the token economy, rather than relying solely on new users buying tokens to support the price?
Healthy mechanisms: Buyback-and-burn (some DePIN projects use revenue to buy back and burn tokens), revenue sharing (stakers share protocol revenue).
Red flags: The token's only use is as "points" to redeem rewards, with no external value backing. The controversy around Grass's second phase originated from this – the project paid out nearly $3 million in rewards in USDC instead of GRASS tokens, and the community questioned: "What use does GRASS have besides waiting for appreciation?"
Step 3: The evolution from "mining and dumping" to "real demand" – Helium as a typical case
Helium is an early DePIN benchmark, and its evolution clearly illustrates how token incentives move from pure speculation to real usage.
Phase 1 (2020-2023): Dominated by token incentives
Users purchased hotspot devices to provide wireless network coverage and earned HNT tokens. At its peak, devices were heavily hyped (a router shot from dozens of dollars to $2,500), but after domestic nodes were blacklisted and banned by the official team, the token price collapsed and devices became worthless.
Phase 2 (2024 to present): Driven by real demand
Helium began offering mobile plans to real users through partnerships with telecom operators such as T-Mobile and AT&T. In Q4 2024, it transmitted 576 TB of mobile data, a 555% quarter-over-quarter increase. Revenue no longer relies entirely on token minting but comes from real enterprise partnerships and user subscriptions. Today Helium provides wireless access for about 450,000 people, with an unlimited data plan at $30 per month, far below the U.S. average of $144.
Conclusion: Even a major project like Helium underwent a long transition from "speculating on hardware" to "selling services" – many early adopters lost money, while those who later used affordable services were the real beneficiaries.
Step 4: Recognize the classic "hardware scam" playbook – which projects are the worst mine-and-dump offenders
The current DePIN market has a clear dual-track phenomenon:
A tiny minority is gradually moving toward real demand:
Helium: Enterprise partnerships bring incremental revenue
Aethir: Single-month revenue in January 2026 was about $55 million, with over 150 enterprise customers
Render: Shifting from rendering to AI inference, January 2026 revenue around $38 million
Geodnet: Annual recurring revenue of about $3 million, up 518% year over year
A large number of projects still rely on "selling hardware" as their core revenue source:
Analysis shows that in the current DePIN market, over 60% of equipment suppliers come from Huaqiangbei in Shenzhen, and the selling prices of these devices are often 30 to 50 times their wholesale cost. The vast majority of hardware investors lose everything.
Typical playbooks:
Hivemapper: Sells a $549 dashcam, but the HONEY token price remains chronically low, making the payback period extremely long. It generated over $60 million from hardware sales – that's "selling equipment" revenue, not a healthy DePIN economic model.
Jambo: A $99 "Web3 phone" that has sold over 400,000 units and activated 1.23 million wallet addresses, but token liquidity and value are a mystery, with no real data buyers paying into the ecosystem.
Starpower: A $100 smart plug; the same model is available on Pinduoduo for only 91 yuan (about $12.5). The project sells devices by "telling a story."
How to distinguish a "real DePIN" from a "hardware scam":
Ask one question: If you remove the token rewards, would anyone still want to buy the hardware?
If the device's functionality (such as a dashcam, smart plug) has no essential difference from ordinary products costing a few dozen yuan, and its main selling point is "mining" – then it's closer to a scam.
Step 5: Look at the broader picture – what stage is DePIN overall at?
Bullish signals:
For the full year 2025, on-chain revenue for DePIN was about $72 million, a qualitative leap from near-zero revenue in the previous cycle. In January 2026, top DePIN projects set a monthly revenue record of about $150 million, driven by enterprise demand for computing power, maps and bandwidth.
Bearish signals:
Behind more than 1,170 DePIN projects, 350 tokens and a $50 billion market cap, total annual revenue falls short of $500 million, and market penetration is near zero. The circulating supply of most DePIN tokens far exceeds actual usage demand, and massive unlocks after cliff vesting periods cause sustained price declines.
Common misconceptions
"Large user numbers = large real demand": Grass has 2.5 million nodes, but when rewards switched from GRASS to USDC, the community revolted – proving many users came for "mining," not for "providing data services." Node count ≠ number of paying customers.
"Enterprise partnerships = the business model is proven": Most collaborations are still in the pilot phase. Whether they can turn into sustained, repeat procurement is the bigger test.
"Token price rising = strong project fundamentals": In the DePIN space, token prices can be driven by speculative money and may not sync with actual network revenue. The market-cap-weighted performance of the DePIN sector in 2025 was also less than ideal.
Risk warnings
In mainland China, DePIN projects involve token issuance and incentives, which may be deemed ICOs or virtual currency mining by regulators, posing legal risks.
DePIN projects that collect map, location or other data (such as Hivemapper) may violate Article 282 of China's Criminal Law on "illegally obtaining state secrets" if they capture sensitive geographic information.
Multi-signature wallet controllers may hold substantive control over project assets, while token holders' governance power is limited.
A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!！
Next steps
If you want to participate in DePIN, don't just look at "annualized yield" and "payback period." Ask three questions first:
Has the project disclosed a concrete list of paying enterprise customers?
How much of its revenue comes from external sources (non-token-minting)?
If token rewards were stopped, would anyone still want to use this network?
Find publicly verifiable revenue evidence (such as on-chain buybacks, enterprise partnership announcements), instead of trusting the expectation that "big institutions will pay in the future" – that is the key to distinguishing "real demand" from "mining and dumping."
