Bro, you've filled pages of journal entries. During review, you flip through them, sigh, and say, "I shouldn't have held that losing trade." Then... nothing happens. When the market opens on Monday, you make the same mistakes all over again.
A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!！
If your journal isn't leading to improvement, there's only one reason: you're treating your review as a look back instead of a decision-making session. A real review isn't about watching what happened. It's about producing three things: what to stop doing, what to start doing, and what to keep improving.
Step 1: Before Reviewing, Separate This Week's Trades into "On Plan" and "Off Plan"
[What to do]: Don't sort by profit or loss. Sort by whether you followed your rules.
[How to do it]: Open this week's journal and add two labels next to each trade:
"On Plan": You wrote down your reason before entering, set a stop loss, and your position size followed your rules.
"Off Plan": You entered on impulse, chased the market, didn't set a stop loss, or your position size was too large.
Then pull out all the "On Plan" trades and calculate their numbers separately: win rate, average profit or loss, and profit/loss ratio. If these trades are making money, your strategy is fine. If these trades are losing money, the strategy itself needs adjustment.
Key difference: A planned loss is tuition. An unplanned profit is poison. It makes you believe you can make money without following your rules.
[Completion standard]: You can say, "This week I had X on-plan trades with a profit/loss ratio of Y, and Z off-plan trades with a profit/loss ratio of W."
Step 2: Find the Most Expensive Mistake This Week and Fix Only That One
[What to do]: Don't write vague goals like "I need more discipline" or "I need to control my emotions." Find one specific, recurring rule violation.
[How to do it]: Go through your journal and count how many times each rule was broken. If a rule was violated twice or more, that's your top target for the week.
A good review output looks like this:
❌ Bad example: "Next week I'll be more disciplined."
✅ Good example: "This week I manually closed 3 trades out of fear before the stop loss was hit. Next week, I will not manually intervene on any trade unless the stop loss or take profit is triggered."
Common reason for failure: Trying to fix five things at once. In the end, none of them get fixed. Lock in only one specific action each week.
[Completion standard]: You wrote down a rule you can actually execute, not just a feeling.
Step 3: Group Trades by Signal Type and See Which Play Should Be Stopped
[What to do]: Group your trades by entry reason or strategy type, then calculate each group's expected value instead of only looking at the overall total.
[How to do it]: In your journal, add a "signal tag" column to each trade, such as "breakout pullback," "moving average crossover," or "news-driven." Then group by tag and calculate for each group:
Average R-value (average profit or loss / risk per trade)
Win rate
Expected value = (win rate × average win) - (loss rate × average loss)
If a signal tag has had a negative expected value for several weeks in a row, stop overthinking it. Pause that play.
[Completion standard]: You clearly know which type of trade to reduce next week and which type to increase.
Step 4: Force Yourself to Output Three Specific Actions
[What to do]: After every review, you must produce three things: one "stop," one "start," and one "optimize."
[How to do it]: Use this format:
Stop: What will you stop doing next week? (Example: Stop opening new positions within 15 minutes before the US stock market opens.)
Start: What must you start doing next week? (Example: Before every trade, write one line explaining your entry reason before clicking confirm.)
Optimize: Which existing rule needs a small adjustment? (Example: Change stop loss from a fixed 5% to an ATR-based dynamic stop.)
Without these three outputs, your review is a waste of time.
[Completion standard]: You wrote down three executable rules, taped them next to your screen, and read them before placing any trade every day next week.
FAQ
Q: How long should a review take? A: Set aside 30 to 40 minutes each week. Don't go over an hour. If it takes too long, you're getting lost in details. That's research, not review.
Q: If all my trades this week were on plan, do I still need a review? A: Yes. Review isn't only for when you make mistakes. If everything went normally, your three outputs can be "confirm that current rules are working and continue executing them." That itself is a valuable decision.
A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!！
Next Action
Today, pull out this week's journal and go through the four steps above. Don't overthink it. Just start:
Separate all trades into "On Plan" and "Off Plan."
Find the one rule you violated most this week.
Group by signal tag and calculate expected value.
Write down one "stop," one "start," and one "optimize."
Tape them next to your screen. Read them before the market opens next week, and read them again after the open.
