Ethereum Burn Mechanism: How to Read On-Chain Data After EIP-1559
After EIP-1559, analyzing Ethereum on-chain data requires three dimensions: burn amount, net issuance, and the dynamic balance between burn and issuance. The core criterion is simple—watch net supply change: burn > issuance = deflation, issuance > burn = inflation. Current data shows Ethereum has returned to a 'net inflation' state.
A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!！
Step 1: First, Distinguish Two Concepts—Burn and Issuance
After EIP-1559, transaction fees are split into Base Fee and Priority Fee. The Base Fee is directly burned and no longer paid to validators. This is the primary mechanism by which ETH is removed from circulation.
At the same time, Ethereum's PoS consensus mechanism continues to issue new ETH daily through staking rewards.Burning only reduces supply, it does not mean supply stops increasing.
The net effect of the two determines whether ETH is inflationary or deflationary.
Step 2: Look at the Data—What Is the Current State?
As of July 2026, Ultrasound.money data shows that the Ethereum network has burned approximately3.817 million ETHin total. However, this number alone does not indicate that ETH is deflationary—the key is net supply.
Data shows that Ethereum's net supply has increased by83,550 ETHover the past 30 days, with an average daily net increase of about 2,785 ETH. This is a clear inflationary signal, as the burn rate has not outpaced the issuance rate during this period.
Core reason: The Dencun upgrade in March 2024 significantly reduced transaction fees for Layer 2, causing a large migration of activity from the Ethereum mainnet to L2s, which sharply reduced the amount of Base Fee burned on the mainnet.
A leading global cryptocurrency platform,suitable for both beginners and experienced traders.
New user benefit: 20% off trading fees upon registration!！
Step 3: How to Read These Data in Practice
Recommended tools:
Ultrasound.money: The most intuitive tool, displaying real-time burn amount, issuance amount, and net supply change, showing whether ETH is deflationary or inflationary over any time period.
Etherscan: Directly query the burn address
0x000000000000000000000000000000000000deadto see details of each burn transaction.
Key indicator checklist:
| Indicator | How to View | Signal Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Total Burn | Ultrasound.money / Etherscan | Cumulative ETH removed |
| Daily Burn Rate | Ultrasound.money | Current network activity level |
| Net Supply Change | Ultrasound.money 'Net Issuance' | Positive = inflation, Negative = deflation |
| 30-Day Net Change | Various data platforms | Medium-term trend assessment |
| Top Burn Contributors | Ultrasound.money | Identify main sources of on-chain activity |
A common pitfall: Looking only at total burn. A total burn of over 3 million may seem large, but ETH's annual issuance under PoS is about 620,000 ETH, and when network activity is low, the daily burn is only about 800 ETH—far below the daily issuance of about 1,600 ETH. Net Issuance is the true metric for judgment.
FAQ
Is Ethereum still 'ultrasound money'?
Based on data from July 2026, net supply increased by 83,550 ETH over 30 days, indicating the network is currently in an inflationary state. After the Dencun upgrade, L2 activity migration caused a significant drop in mainnet burn volume, and the 'ultrasound money' narrative is not supported by the data.
How has the burn volume changed compared to before the Dencun upgrade?
Before the Dencun upgrade, Layer 2 calldata costs were high, so much activity still occurred on the mainnet; after the upgrade, L2 fees dropped significantly, causing a steep decline in mainnet Base Fee burn. For comparison: in Q2 2024, the network added 75,301 ETH (inflation), whereas during the previous high-activity period, ETH had achieved short-term deflation multiple times.
Which scenarios generate the most burn?
Regular ETH transfers, NFT platforms (OpenSea), and DEX trades (Uniswap) are the largest sources of burn. When these activities collectively decline, the burn volume naturally falls.
